<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Greening&#8221; Your Condoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://honestexchange.com/greening-your-condoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://honestexchange.com/greening-your-condoms/</link>
	<description>Sexuality: core issues, clear communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:20:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDavis</title>
		<link>http://honestexchange.com/greening-your-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>MDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://honestexchange.com/?p=607#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Sounds fairly silly for a condom company&#039;s PR firm to be skittish about promoting yet another benefit of condoms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds fairly silly for a condom company&#8217;s PR firm to be skittish about promoting yet another benefit of condoms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://honestexchange.com/greening-your-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://honestexchange.com/?p=607#comment-3</guid>
		<description>For those primarily concerned by climate change: some condom manufacturers are making their products less carbon intensive but not even telling us! The health and well-being message which needs to be got across is (rightly) deemed more important than &#039;green&#039; condoms. It doesn&#039;t help the trash aspect of the environmental problem though.

The chairman of the company which makes the Durex brand recently detailed how much &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.energy-savingnews.com/2009/07/condoms-reduce-carbon-footprints-supply-chains/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;less carbon intensive Durex condoms&lt;/a&gt; were becoming in a quietly-released eco-article, but their normal PR refuses to pursue the message. The company gains by reduced production costs and we gain from making our nocturnal habits less carbon-intensive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those primarily concerned by climate change: some condom manufacturers are making their products less carbon intensive but not even telling us! The health and well-being message which needs to be got across is (rightly) deemed more important than &#8216;green&#8217; condoms. It doesn&#8217;t help the trash aspect of the environmental problem though.</p>
<p>The chairman of the company which makes the Durex brand recently detailed how much <a href="http://www.energy-savingnews.com/2009/07/condoms-reduce-carbon-footprints-supply-chains/" rel="nofollow">less carbon intensive Durex condoms</a> were becoming in a quietly-released eco-article, but their normal PR refuses to pursue the message. The company gains by reduced production costs and we gain from making our nocturnal habits less carbon-intensive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

